Dig Report 1 (Part 2)
Part 2.
TR02-5 section north to south Figure: 05.
Context
5
This is an extension of the trench eastwards and the three stratigraphical
layers found in contexts 1,2 and 3 apply for colour and soil type. However, the
1mt x 600mm extension exposed the remains of a hearth. With heat discoloured
stones, furnace waste, charcoal and some potsherds found. A large decoloured
stone appeared to have striations as if struck by a sharp metal edge and it is
speculated the large hearth edge stone mentioned in Context 3 above was from
the south of this striated stone, see Figure 07 above and plate 05 above.
Colour 2.5Y 4/2 dark grey brown.
Scale =200mm Figure:06.
North section of TR02 with possible cut; not clear it
continued northwards. See also figure 06 above for section in plan.
Scale
=1.5mts.
Line of section Figure 06 above Natural bedrock reddened by heat at D-560mm
TR05 and part of TR02 note. Fire Hearth and Cross
section Plate.05 position.
TR05 hearth edge stone Plate:
04.
TR05 Possible Fire Hearth Plate:
05.
TR06
Contexts
01
Layer 1, including turf and topsoil
is between 150 and 180mm deep, the bottom of which consists of a 19th
century field-dressing layer within 40 mm of topsoil; Colour 10YR2/1 black.
Context 02 Layer 2 is 50mm to 100 mm of stone (possibly from demolition) and poorer quality clay/sandy loam. Few finds in this layer dating medieval or earlier but mainly 19th century waste included in field dressing, for example, clay pipe and pottery fragments; Colour 10Y3/1 very dark grey.
Context 03 is essentially a 500mm x 1mt sondage in the north half of the test pit. This stratigraphic layer was different from others in that it contained useful building stone but along with all possible masonry there appears to be no mortar. The overriding impression is of a filled in pit with redeposited natural material with no intention to be structural. Colour 2.5Y 4/2 dark grey brown.
Context
04 is
very similar to Context 3, the soil samples appear the same in colour and
content but with less charcoal, bone
fragments and the like within it.
Colour 2.5Y 4/2 dark grey brown.
TR06 contexts Scale= 200mm Figure:07.
TR06 test pit plan view Plate: 06.
Appendix 4
Artefacts
In Context 1, across the site dug so far due to there
numerous nature, as yet uncounted, 19th century artefacts were found
This is mainly from a field-dressing layer thought to be the base of ancient
ploughing see Plate 07 below. The field dressing is thought to be from burning
general detritus then spreading to dispose of it. It consisted of china
fragments clearly exposed to severe heat, garden potsherds, wrought iron nails,
charcoal, fragments of coal, ash and the like; Only a typical selection of this
material was collected as so much was present the remainder was left in situ.
Typical selection of Context 1finds in TR02 to TR06 Plate: 07.
Stone Finds.
Several stone object have been identified as possible
artifacts.
- Sandstone
pieces that may have been roof tiles. See plate 08 below
TR02 Typical of Sandstone fragments found in all
trenches. Plate:08.
- Possible loom weights fragments including one piece with a nail hole loop, see plate 09 below.
Tr02 Possibly top of loom weight Plate 09.
-Stone artifacts also include the local limestone used
in high temperature situations, possibly for cooking hearths and metalworking;
this manifests as red discolouration in the outer stone surface. See plate 5
above.
-Potboilers have been identified; although some seem
small for this purpose they do show typical delamination.
-A very smooth stone approx. 40mm in diameter was
uncovered in TR04, which is assumed a slingshot stone.
-Finally bivalve mollusc fossils that have been found
removed from stones have. It is speculated these are possibly curios or
pilgrims or visitors souvenirs. Found in our earliest contexts. See plate 10 below.
Trenches TR02and 03 fossilized bivalve molluscs Plate: 10.
It has proven very difficult to identify any particular structure due to the large amount of rubble scattered within all the trenches dug; for further discussion see below.
Ceramics
Date range is difficult to ascertain with any
certainty.
Notable artefacts are as follows.
TR04A rough and friable courseware potsherd Plate: 11.
Potsherd displaying similar qualities to early Oxford ware Plate: 12.
TR02 Rouletted potsherd Plate: 13.
TR02Combed ware Plate:
14.
- Medieval Ham Green ware, there are numerous Ham Green potsherds, these could all of course form a single large pot. This type can be accurately dated to AD 1100 to AD1250. See Plate: 15 below.
TR02 and 05 Ham Green ware Plate: 15.
At the point of publication, after AD1250 there a long gap to the 19th Century field-dressing artefact described above.
Using just pottery recovered, as of the publication
date of this report, our date range is possibly Bronze or Iron Age to AD 1350.
The majority of our potsherd finds however, according to David Dawson, of
Well’s Museum are late Saxo Norman to Late Medieval.
Metal Artifacts
Wrought Iron
In total there are over 120 pieces of wrought iron. To
give a flavour of the finds notable items in possible chronological are listed
below.
- A stocking clip possibly Mid Saxon period.
- 50 fiddle Key nails in a wide range of condition and
use Mid Saxon to Saxo-Norman.
- Byzantine style handle with one mounting loop,
possibly for side mounting to a bowl. Dating is very difficult but its
condition and the context it was found in suggest Saxo Norman.
- Pair of Prick Spurs with pyramidal goads, very well
made with tapering D section prongs to riveted leather strap mounts still
intact; possibly tin coated. Dated AD
1000 to AD 1150, Saxo Norman.
- Two knife blades have been identified with a typical
Saxon shape in section and plan. Part of a bone handle has been found but it is
unclear if this belongs to either blade. One the blade’s was broken in two
pieces and found separately, which may indicate previous digging and re
depositing. Possibly Saxo-Norman
There are 8 wrought iron artefacts that appear
manufactured with a high level of skill, but their use cannot be identified.
Wrought iron finds Plate:
16.
Possible Saxo Norman spurs Plate: 17.
Knife blades and bone handle Plate: 18.
Copper Alloy
To date there are 7 copper alloy artifacts in
total.
- A pyramidal stud possibly mounted on a scabbard or equestrian
leather ware. Undated.
- Part of a pair of tweezers. Appears to have fragments
of tin-plating in situ.
- Stud mount, with some tin-plating surviving. Tin
corrosion oxide evident but with some surfaces having retained its
tin-plating. Two fragments of blue
enamel are attached; also it does appear that some of the bradding pattern is
also intact on the decorative face. Push in stud still intact on the reverse
side. This has been dated British Romano AD 100 to AD 350.
- Possible book clasp with a heraldic saltire pattern
embossed.
- Low Status Belt End, approx. 25mm by 25mm with three
rivets still attached. Three rivets are still in place indicating it may have
been buried still attached to the leather of the belt. .
- Middle status? Strap End with zoomorphic decoration
on one surface possibly a serpent or dragon’s head and neck. Dated AD 800 to AD 1000.See Plate: 17 above..
TR02 and TR04 Copper Alloy finds. Plate: 19.
TR02 Cooper Alloy Stud 1st to 3rd Century Plate:
20.
20th Century finds include Second World War shrapnel; research shows most likely from an ‘Ack Ack’ battery stationed on the A46 near Little Sodbury. A similar piece was found approximately 100mtres north west of the Glebe Field near the church during a metal detecting survey 2021 near St. Anne’s Church. See Plate: 21below.
Second World War shrapnel Plate:
21.
Bone
To date we have approximately 500 bone fragments. All
those examined by an osteoarchaeology expert have been identified as animal
bone mainly Bovine, Porcine, Ovine and a few very small poultry bones.
One long bone, a bovine Tibia and Fibula stood out
from the others. It was complete and only broken post burial. It had one small
butchery mark alone to the distal end of the tibia. This all indicates burial
as a whole joint. This is currently being carbon dated; it is also of great
interest as it was buried directly underneath the pair of spurs mentioned above
in wrought iron. See Plate 18 above.
TR02 Tibia and Fibula. Plate:
22.
Structures
To date we have 5no possible postholes in TR02 2no in
trench TR04 and 1no in TR06. Most of
these are speculative however, shown in plate 19 below the two ‘blue circled’
possible posthole bases within TR02 measure within millimetres of being
perfectly level.
TR02 and 05 possible posthole alignments Plate: 23.
See also Figure 07 above. The first posthole uncovered
on the 18th June 2021 appeared to have hot work smelting slag poured
into it, see plate 20 above. As a section of the posthole was attempted a blade
94 mm long was recovered, due to shape and section this at the moment is dated
Saxo- Norman.
Figure 24.
Figure 25.
Hot poured furnace waste in possible posthole.
Figures: 24 & 25.
A possible alignment of postholes can be see in plate:
19 above, also within trench TR02 speculation is of a grubenhaus as the holes
appear to be on an angle, for more details. See section Figure 07 above.
However, due to the very stony nature of the trenches all but the possibly post
hole dug on 18th June 2021 could be artifacts of the process of digging and be
false and will need more work to verify.
Trenches TR02 and TR03 and TR05 have a large spread of
stone that diminishes either side of the highest point of the shallow mound.
This stone is not smoothed on its upper surface as be expected of a metaled
track surface. Neither is the quality good enough as would be expected for
building stone. There is no sign of mortar on stone surface or loose in the
surrounding contexts. Also there are stone fragments that have been exposed to
extreme heat. So the working hypothesis at the moment is of a possible drystone
wall structure demolished and robbed out the remainder levelled and eventually
covered over with soil morphologically or by hand.
The position of Trench TR04 was chosen for its low
resistance response. This was by and large proven correct with much less stone
evident however; in context 04 on the east side of the trench what appeared to be
redeposited stone. See Plate 03 above.
The position of TR06 was chosen, as it appeared to be
on the corner of a rectilinear shape shown on the resistivity survey; it has a
high resistance response. Again this was
extremely stony backfill with some good quality building stone within it, which
stood it apart from TR02, 03 and 05. The indication that it may be a possibly
structure, it was our deepest pit at over 900 mm below ground level and due to
rising water levels the natural was not located.